header-logo header-logo

Inheritance Act claims: A high bar for adult children?

25 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
75711
How does the court approach the issue of adult children who claim a will fails to provide for them? Myles McIntosh reports
  • In Miles and another v Shearer [2021] EWHC 1000 (Ch), two adult children brought separate claims for financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependents) Act 1975.

The case of Miles and another v Shearer [2021] EWHC 1000 (Ch), which gathered significant press interest, recently looked at the increasingly common scenario of adult children bringing separate claims for financial provision. The case provides a detailed analysis of the approach the court will take into account when considering these types of claims.

Juliet Miles and Lauretta Shearer (‘the claimants’) brought claims, as the adult daughters of the late Anthony Shearer who died in 2017, against his estate. They both sought orders that their father’s will (prepared in 2015) failed to make reasonable financial provision for them.

The claimants were the children from Mr Shearer’s first marriage. That marriage was dissolved in 2007 after 34 years.

Mr

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll