header-logo header-logo

25 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Inheritance Act claims: A high bar for adult children?

75711
How does the court approach the issue of adult children who claim a will fails to provide for them? Myles McIntosh reports
  • In Miles and another v Shearer [2021] EWHC 1000 (Ch), two adult children brought separate claims for financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependents) Act 1975.

The case of Miles and another v Shearer [2021] EWHC 1000 (Ch), which gathered significant press interest, recently looked at the increasingly common scenario of adult children bringing separate claims for financial provision. The case provides a detailed analysis of the approach the court will take into account when considering these types of claims.

Juliet Miles and Lauretta Shearer (‘the claimants’) brought claims, as the adult daughters of the late Anthony Shearer who died in 2017, against his estate. They both sought orders that their father’s will (prepared in 2015) failed to make reasonable financial provision for them.

The claimants were the children from Mr Shearer’s first marriage. That marriage was dissolved in 2007 after 34 years.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll