header-logo header-logo

Inheritance Act claims: A high bar for adult children?

25 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
75711
How does the court approach the issue of adult children who claim a will fails to provide for them? Myles McIntosh reports
  • In Miles and another v Shearer [2021] EWHC 1000 (Ch), two adult children brought separate claims for financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependents) Act 1975.

The case of Miles and another v Shearer [2021] EWHC 1000 (Ch), which gathered significant press interest, recently looked at the increasingly common scenario of adult children bringing separate claims for financial provision. The case provides a detailed analysis of the approach the court will take into account when considering these types of claims.

Juliet Miles and Lauretta Shearer (‘the claimants’) brought claims, as the adult daughters of the late Anthony Shearer who died in 2017, against his estate. They both sought orders that their father’s will (prepared in 2015) failed to make reasonable financial provision for them.

The claimants were the children from Mr Shearer’s first marriage. That marriage was dissolved in 2007 after 34 years.

Mr

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll