header-logo header-logo

Injunction—Private and confidential information—Sexual relationship between claimant and colleague

16 June 2011
Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Goodwin v NGN Ltd [2011] EWHC 1437 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 45 (Jun)

Queen’s Bench Division, Tugendhat J, 9 Jun 2011

The High Court has given guidance in the circumstances in which the parties to a sexual relationship may or may not hold a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of that relationship, and when it may or may not be in the public interest for disclosure of the fact (but not the details) of a relationship.

Richard Spearman QC (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the respondent. Hugh Tomlinson QC (instructed by Olswangs) for the interested party, VBN. The claimant did not appear and was not represented.

The claimant was the former head of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS). He had received much adverse publicity since leaving the bank, which had had to be rescued with vast sums of public money. The defendant was the publisher of the Sun newspaper. On 1 March 2011, it contacted the claimant with an allegation that he had had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll