header-logo header-logo

Insolvency

12 April 2013
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Sinclair v Glatt and others [2013] EWCA Civ 241, [2013] All ER (D) 295 (Mar)

It was settled law that receivers appointed under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (CJA 1988) were officers of the court and subject to the supervision of the court. Receivers so appointed generally acted in accordance with the common law, save to the extent that CJA 1988 stipulated otherwise. It was an established common law principle that such a receiver ordinarily was entitled to look to the assets of the receivership estate to indemnify him for his remuneration, costs and expenses, and might have a lien over such assets for that purpose. Further, the right to an indemnity was not extinguished by discharge of the receivership order and the lien could continue to exist for that purpose after discharge. In addition, where a receivership order made under CJA 1988 was discharged, the receiver continued to be an officer of the court to the extent that he still had functions to perform with a view to a final conclusion of the administration of the receivership.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll