header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency—Administrator—Removal

Finnerty and another v Clark and another [2011] EWCA Civ 858, [2011] All ER (D) 201 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Mummery, Carnwath and Richards LJJ, 21 July 2011

The court has statutory power to remove and replace company administrators, but it first has to be established by the evidence that there is a good or sufficient ground or cause for the removal and replacement; only then can the court properly proceed to consider the exercise of its discretion by having regard to all the relevant factors for and against an order for removal.

Bridget Williamson (instructed by Coyle White Devine) for the appellants. Jamie Riley (instructed by Ingram Winter Green) for the respondents

The questions before the court on a second appeal were (i) what were good and sufficient grounds for the court’s exercise of its discretion under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) to remove administrators from office; and (ii) in what circumstances should a court on appeal disturb a first instance decision to remove administrators. At first instance the registrar granted the appellants’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll