header-logo header-logo

Insolvency—Administrator—Removal

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Finnerty and another v Clark and another [2011] EWCA Civ 858, [2011] All ER (D) 201 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Mummery, Carnwath and Richards LJJ, 21 July 2011

The court has statutory power to remove and replace company administrators, but it first has to be established by the evidence that there is a good or sufficient ground or cause for the removal and replacement; only then can the court properly proceed to consider the exercise of its discretion by having regard to all the relevant factors for and against an order for removal.

Bridget Williamson (instructed by Coyle White Devine) for the appellants. Jamie Riley (instructed by Ingram Winter Green) for the respondents

The questions before the court on a second appeal were (i) what were good and sufficient grounds for the court’s exercise of its discretion under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) to remove administrators from office; and (ii) in what circumstances should a court on appeal disturb a first instance decision to remove administrators. At first instance the registrar granted the appellants’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll