header-logo header-logo

Insolvency—Administrator—Removal

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Finnerty and another v Clark and another [2011] EWCA Civ 858, [2011] All ER (D) 201 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Mummery, Carnwath and Richards LJJ, 21 July 2011

The court has statutory power to remove and replace company administrators, but it first has to be established by the evidence that there is a good or sufficient ground or cause for the removal and replacement; only then can the court properly proceed to consider the exercise of its discretion by having regard to all the relevant factors for and against an order for removal.

Bridget Williamson (instructed by Coyle White Devine) for the appellants. Jamie Riley (instructed by Ingram Winter Green) for the respondents

The questions before the court on a second appeal were (i) what were good and sufficient grounds for the court’s exercise of its discretion under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) to remove administrators from office; and (ii) in what circumstances should a court on appeal disturb a first instance decision to remove administrators. At first instance the registrar granted the appellants’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll