header-logo header-logo

Insolvency—Administrator—Removal

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Finnerty and another v Clark and another [2011] EWCA Civ 858, [2011] All ER (D) 201 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Mummery, Carnwath and Richards LJJ, 21 July 2011

The court has statutory power to remove and replace company administrators, but it first has to be established by the evidence that there is a good or sufficient ground or cause for the removal and replacement; only then can the court properly proceed to consider the exercise of its discretion by having regard to all the relevant factors for and against an order for removal.

Bridget Williamson (instructed by Coyle White Devine) for the appellants. Jamie Riley (instructed by Ingram Winter Green) for the respondents

The questions before the court on a second appeal were (i) what were good and sufficient grounds for the court’s exercise of its discretion under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) to remove administrators from office; and (ii) in what circumstances should a court on appeal disturb a first instance decision to remove administrators. At first instance the registrar granted the appellants’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll