header-logo header-logo

03 March 2015
Issue: 7643 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Insolvency given LASPO reprieve

Insolvency litigation will continue to be exempt from the Legal Aid, Sentencing, and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) “for the time being”, the government has announced.

Justice minister Lord Faulks said in a written statement last week that insolvency proceedings had initially been given a two-year reprieve until April 2015 from Laspo to give insolvency practitioners and other interested parties “time to prepare for an adapt to the changes…the government now agrees that more time is needed”.

No win no fee agreements will therefore continue “for the time being” on a pre-LASPO basis with success fees and after-the-event insurance premiums recoverable from the losing party. Further details will be set out “later in the year”.

Shadow Justice Minister Andy Slaughter MP accused the government of performing a U-turn and a “humiliating climb down” by not making the exemption permanent. He said Laspo was “so pitted with faults that an early review of its impact is now essential”.

R3, the insolvency trade body, said the decision protects £160m of creditors’ money a year that otherwise could have been kept by fraudulent or negligent directors or third parties. It said court cases would be uneconomical without the exemption. R3 has campaigned for the exemption to be made permanent.

R3 president, Giles Frampton says: “Insolvency litigation brings back millions of pounds every year to small businesses and taxpayers owed money by negligent or fraudulent directors. This money would have been put at risk if insolvency practitioners lost their ability to use ‘no-win, no-fee’ funding from April.”

 

Issue: 7643 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll