header-logo header-logo

03 March 2015
Issue: 7643 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Insolvency given LASPO reprieve

Insolvency litigation will continue to be exempt from the Legal Aid, Sentencing, and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) “for the time being”, the government has announced.

Justice minister Lord Faulks said in a written statement last week that insolvency proceedings had initially been given a two-year reprieve until April 2015 from Laspo to give insolvency practitioners and other interested parties “time to prepare for an adapt to the changes…the government now agrees that more time is needed”.

No win no fee agreements will therefore continue “for the time being” on a pre-LASPO basis with success fees and after-the-event insurance premiums recoverable from the losing party. Further details will be set out “later in the year”.

Shadow Justice Minister Andy Slaughter MP accused the government of performing a U-turn and a “humiliating climb down” by not making the exemption permanent. He said Laspo was “so pitted with faults that an early review of its impact is now essential”.

R3, the insolvency trade body, said the decision protects £160m of creditors’ money a year that otherwise could have been kept by fraudulent or negligent directors or third parties. It said court cases would be uneconomical without the exemption. R3 has campaigned for the exemption to be made permanent.

R3 president, Giles Frampton says: “Insolvency litigation brings back millions of pounds every year to small businesses and taxpayers owed money by negligent or fraudulent directors. This money would have been put at risk if insolvency practitioners lost their ability to use ‘no-win, no-fee’ funding from April.”

 

Issue: 7643 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll