header-logo header-logo

Insurance

20 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd and another company v The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime [2013] EWHC 2734 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 96 (Sep)

In a case arising out of claims concerning damage to a warehouse during the London riots of 2011, two preliminary issues were before the court. First, whether the losses claimed by the claimants, insofar as proved, arose out of the injury to, or the destruction of, a building or the destruction of any property therein, by any persons riotously and tumultuously assembled together within the meaning of s 2(1) of the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 at the warehouse on 8 August 2011. Second, whether consequential losses, including loss of profit and loss of rent, were in principle recoverable pursuant to s 2(1) and/or 2(2) of the Act. The court ruled, first, that the group of youths who had attacked, looted and set fire to the warehouse had been “persons riotously and tumultuously assembled together” within the meaning of the Act. There was no doubt that the elements of the statutory offence of riot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll