header-logo header-logo

Insurance

20 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd and another company v The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime [2013] EWHC 2734 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 96 (Sep)

In a case arising out of claims concerning damage to a warehouse during the London riots of 2011, two preliminary issues were before the court. First, whether the losses claimed by the claimants, insofar as proved, arose out of the injury to, or the destruction of, a building or the destruction of any property therein, by any persons riotously and tumultuously assembled together within the meaning of s 2(1) of the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 at the warehouse on 8 August 2011. Second, whether consequential losses, including loss of profit and loss of rent, were in principle recoverable pursuant to s 2(1) and/or 2(2) of the Act. The court ruled, first, that the group of youths who had attacked, looted and set fire to the warehouse had been “persons riotously and tumultuously assembled together” within the meaning of the Act. There was no doubt that the elements of the statutory offence of riot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll