header-logo header-logo

25 March 2016
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Insurance premium tax attack

The Bar Council has raised concerns about rises to the insurance premium tax, announced in the Budget.

The Treasury increased the standard rate of insurance premium tax to 10%, pushing up the cost of before- and after-the-event legal expenses insurance. The rise follows an increase from 6% to 9.5% in November 2015.

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, chairman of the Bar, brands the increase “a direct attack on the responsible consumer’s wallet”.

“This is not a tax on the insurers; it is a tax that the policy holder has to pay directly if they want to protect themselves in a claim. This tax increase should not be taken in isolation. With the government increasing the fees people have to pay to use our courts for civil claims, anyone would think they are actively pricing hardworking families and individuals up and down the country out of the justice system.”

Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll