header-logo header-logo

Insurers’ predictions for 2018

25 January 2018
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

The expansion of the ‘cat’ (catastrophe) bond market and ‘seismic’ changes to the medical malpractice insurance market are among the top 10 predicted highlights of 2018, according to law firm RPC’s Annual Insurance Review. A government-backed scheme will help resolve the problem of GPs leaving practice due to rising insurance premiums. In the ‘cat’ market, drones, satellite imaging and other gadgetry will help the insurance industry write better risks. Overall, technology ‘from the higher risks related to data breaches to the impact of blockchain and driverless ships’ is a common theme of 2018, said Simon Laird, RPC’s global head of insurance.

Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll