header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Insurrection & court intervention: a high-stakes gamble? Pt 2

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
12 January 2024 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Features , International
printer mail-detail
152794
Will Trump be stopped from standing? Michael Zander on the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision
  • The Colorado State Supreme Court held in December 2023 by a majority of 4–3 that former President Trump was disqualified from holding the Office of President.
  • Analysis of the court’s majority judgment and three dissenting opinions.

On 19 December 2023, the Colorado State Supreme Court held, by a bare majority of 4–3, that Donald J Trump was ‘disqualified from holding the Office of President under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution’ and that ‘because he is disqualified it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Colorado Secretary of State to list him as a candidate in the presidential primary ballot,’ (see bit.ly/3H6Oiyr).

On 3 January, Trump asked the US Supreme Court to overturn the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision. A brief filed by attorney-generals from 27 states supported the request arguing that removing Trump from the ballot would ‘create widespread chaos’.

On

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll