header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 January 2024 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Features , International
printer mail-detail

Insurrection & court intervention: a high-stakes gamble? Pt 2

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
152794
Will Trump be stopped from standing? Michael Zander on the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision
  • The Colorado State Supreme Court held in December 2023 by a majority of 4–3 that former President Trump was disqualified from holding the Office of President.
  • Analysis of the court’s majority judgment and three dissenting opinions.

On 19 December 2023, the Colorado State Supreme Court held, by a bare majority of 4–3, that Donald J Trump was ‘disqualified from holding the Office of President under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution’ and that ‘because he is disqualified it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Colorado Secretary of State to list him as a candidate in the presidential primary ballot,’ (see bit.ly/3H6Oiyr).

On 3 January, Trump asked the US Supreme Court to overturn the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision. A brief filed by attorney-generals from 27 states supported the request arguing that removing Trump from the ballot would ‘create widespread chaos’.

On

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll