header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 April 2008 / Diane Saunders
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Interesting times

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

How is the Financial Services Authority doing as a mortgage regulator? Diane Saunders reports

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has regulated mortgages since October 2005. Since then we have contacted the FSA to clarify rules or to check how we should proceed. Staff do their best to help, but often can't because they cannot give us exact guidance, while warning us that if we misinterpret the rules we will be liable to censure.

We are now charged to “treat customers fairly”. Well, we thought we did, but only 22% of mortgage intermediaries met the first deadline of March 2007, when they had to demonstrate they were applying the Treating Customers Fairly principles in a substantial part of their business. The final deadline has now been extended until December 2008.

The regulatory advice “industry” has grown because it is becoming more difficult for advisers to read the many directives and dictats issued and incorporate them into our working lives. The introduction of “principles-based” regulation does not seem to make much difference.

The FSA regulates everything

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll