header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008 / Diane Saunders
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Interesting times

How is the Financial Services Authority doing as a mortgage regulator? Diane Saunders reports

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has regulated mortgages since October 2005. Since then we have contacted the FSA to clarify rules or to check how we should proceed. Staff do their best to help, but often can't because they cannot give us exact guidance, while warning us that if we misinterpret the rules we will be liable to censure.

We are now charged to “treat customers fairly”. Well, we thought we did, but only 22% of mortgage intermediaries met the first deadline of March 2007, when they had to demonstrate they were applying the Treating Customers Fairly principles in a substantial part of their business. The final deadline has now been extended until December 2008.

The regulatory advice “industry” has grown because it is becoming more difficult for advisers to read the many directives and dictats issued and incorporate them into our working lives. The introduction of “principles-based” regulation does not seem to make much difference.

The FSA regulates everything

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll