header-logo header-logo

Internal affairs

20 January 2017 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7730_sanders

There is no general principle that a child should be summarily returned where one parent moves them from their home to another place in England & Wales, says Claire Sanders

  • In a domestic abduction case the welfare of the child is the court’s paramount consideration having regard to all the relevant features, including the matters listed in ChA 1989, s 1(3).

If, as the Court of Appeal confirmed in the 2015 decision in Re C (a child) (Internal relocation) [2015] EWCA Civ 1305, [2015] All ER (D) 211 (Dec), there is no reason to differentiate between the approach adopted in external and internal relocation cases and the authorities applicable to external relocation also apply to internal relocation how, if at all, would that decision then have an impact on cases where there has been a domestic abduction?

This question was fairly swiftly tested in Re R (a child) (domestic abduction) [2016] EWCA Civ 1016, [2016] All ER (D) 170 (Oct), in which the father argued that, in the light of Re C ,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll