header-logo header-logo

20 January 2017 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Internal affairs

nlj_7730_sanders

There is no general principle that a child should be summarily returned where one parent moves them from their home to another place in England & Wales, says Claire Sanders

  • In a domestic abduction case the welfare of the child is the court’s paramount consideration having regard to all the relevant features, including the matters listed in ChA 1989, s 1(3).

If, as the Court of Appeal confirmed in the 2015 decision in Re C (a child) (Internal relocation) [2015] EWCA Civ 1305, [2015] All ER (D) 211 (Dec), there is no reason to differentiate between the approach adopted in external and internal relocation cases and the authorities applicable to external relocation also apply to internal relocation how, if at all, would that decision then have an impact on cases where there has been a domestic abduction?

This question was fairly swiftly tested in Re R (a child) (domestic abduction) [2016] EWCA Civ 1016, [2016] All ER (D) 170 (Oct), in which the father argued that, in the light of Re C ,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll