header-logo header-logo

International arbitration: a post-LIDW reflection

25 July 2019 / Barry Fletcher
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-detail

What are the current challenges for international commercial arbitration in London & beyond? Barry Fletcher reflects on some of the issues

Energetic discussion regarding the current state and future of international commercial arbitration was at the heart of this May’s inaugural London International Disputes Week (LIDW). Drawing on some of the event’s key themes, I have set out to demonstrate that while London arbitration faces some particular challenges to its continued success, the most significant issues facing this form of dispute resolution are not exclusive to London or, indeed, any single seat of arbitration.

What can data tell us?

First, let’s consider one barometer of health: arbitration caseload statistics. As my colleague James Clanchy examined in a recent article (‘Arbitration statistics 2018: London bucks downward trends’, LexisNexis DR Blog, 20 June 2019), an analysis of 2018 statistics from six major international arbitral bodies—the HKIAC, the ICC, the LCIA, the LMAA (not an arbitral institution but an association of arbitrators who conduct arbitrations under its ad hoc procedure rules), the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll