header-logo header-logo

25 July 2019 / Barry Fletcher
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-detail

International arbitration: a post-LIDW reflection

What are the current challenges for international commercial arbitration in London & beyond? Barry Fletcher reflects on some of the issues

Energetic discussion regarding the current state and future of international commercial arbitration was at the heart of this May’s inaugural London International Disputes Week (LIDW). Drawing on some of the event’s key themes, I have set out to demonstrate that while London arbitration faces some particular challenges to its continued success, the most significant issues facing this form of dispute resolution are not exclusive to London or, indeed, any single seat of arbitration.

What can data tell us?

First, let’s consider one barometer of health: arbitration caseload statistics. As my colleague James Clanchy examined in a recent article (‘Arbitration statistics 2018: London bucks downward trends’, LexisNexis DR Blog, 20 June 2019), an analysis of 2018 statistics from six major international arbitral bodies—the HKIAC, the ICC, the LCIA, the LMAA (not an arbitral institution but an association of arbitrators who conduct arbitrations under its ad hoc procedure rules),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll