header-logo header-logo

25 February 2022 / Masood Ahmed , Syed Naman Ali
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

International arbitration: clause & effect

73197
Admissibility & jurisdiction: Masood Ahmed & Syed Ali report on dispute resolution clauses in international commercial arbitration
  • Two recent High Court decisions have confirmed that pre-arbitral dispute resolution obligations are not matters of jurisdiction; rather they are matters of admissibility, which are for arbitral tribunals to determine and not the national courts.

Dispute resolution clauses (sometimes referred to as ADR clauses or tiered clauses) are becoming an increasingly common feature of international commercial contracts. In essence, a dispute resolution clause (DR clause) requires parties to exhaust a number of alternative dispute resolution procedures (eg negotiation, mediation etc) before the matter can be referred to arbitration or litigation. Therefore, DR clauses provide the parties with opportunities to explore whether their dispute can be settled before launching expensive and time-consuming court or arbitration proceedings.

An issue that may arise in arbitration is whether a party’s failure to comply with a DR clause may give rise to an issue of admissibility for the arbitral tribunal, or whether it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll