header-logo header-logo

International arbitration: clause & effect

25 February 2022 / Masood Ahmed , Syed Naman Ali
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
73197
Admissibility & jurisdiction: Masood Ahmed & Syed Ali report on dispute resolution clauses in international commercial arbitration
  • Two recent High Court decisions have confirmed that pre-arbitral dispute resolution obligations are not matters of jurisdiction; rather they are matters of admissibility, which are for arbitral tribunals to determine and not the national courts.

Dispute resolution clauses (sometimes referred to as ADR clauses or tiered clauses) are becoming an increasingly common feature of international commercial contracts. In essence, a dispute resolution clause (DR clause) requires parties to exhaust a number of alternative dispute resolution procedures (eg negotiation, mediation etc) before the matter can be referred to arbitration or litigation. Therefore, DR clauses provide the parties with opportunities to explore whether their dispute can be settled before launching expensive and time-consuming court or arbitration proceedings.

An issue that may arise in arbitration is whether a party’s failure to comply with a DR clause may give rise to an issue of admissibility for the arbitral tribunal, or whether it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll