header-logo header-logo

Intestacy turns to trust

05 May 2011 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Michael Tringham reviews some recent court decisions at home & abroad

The relationship of cohabitants Tina Cattle and Paul John Evans ended on 23 March 1990, when 59-year-old Mr Evans died—intestate. Subsequently Ms Cattle claimed “reasonable provision” from the deceased’s £220,000 estate, referring to a will drafted three days before his death but never executed. Mr Evans’s sons Paul and Gareth, beneficiaries on the intestacy, disputed her claim.

The couple lived together in England, Spain and latterly Wales between 1990 and 2009—albeit with a two-year hiatus after 1997. The trial transcript (Cattle v Evans [2011] EWHC 945 (Ch)) refers to a marriage proposal that was never formalised—and the planned purchase of a home in Wales with money from the sale of a jointly owned Spanish property.  But that plan was overtaken by the deceased’s being diagnosed with terminal cancer eight months before his death. Instead he bought the house almost entirely with his own money and the property was conveyed into his sole name, apparently for tax reasons.

While solicitors’ attendance notes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll