header-logo header-logo

Intractable contact?

06 October 2017 / Kate Molan
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7764_molan

Kate Molan discusses how best to address implacable hostility & the increase in parental alienation

 

  • Intractable contact cases are some of the hardest to resolve.
  • Parental alienation can include belittling, brainwashing and other strategies.

After a relationship breaks down, the task of agreeing arrangements for any children can be a complex one, and many separating parents struggle to come to terms with the new dynamics and mutual respect that co-parenting entails. Indeed, there are some cases in which extreme, negative behaviour is exhibited by one parent with the aim of undermining a child’s relationship with the other. Such characteristics and behaviour have come to be known as implacable or intractable hostility—a term that should only be applied to a parent who will do almost anything to frustrate a relationship between the child and their other parent.

Implacable hostility can often result in parental alienation. Parental alienation describes a situation where a child has been deliberately manipulated, coerced or otherwise pressured to align themselves to one parent by the other. The impact on children

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

Firm elects new senior partner to lead next phase of growth

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Partner appointed head of family and divorce

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll