header-logo header-logo

Intractable contact?

06 October 2017 / Kate Molan
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7764_molan

Kate Molan discusses how best to address implacable hostility & the increase in parental alienation

 

  • Intractable contact cases are some of the hardest to resolve.
  • Parental alienation can include belittling, brainwashing and other strategies.

After a relationship breaks down, the task of agreeing arrangements for any children can be a complex one, and many separating parents struggle to come to terms with the new dynamics and mutual respect that co-parenting entails. Indeed, there are some cases in which extreme, negative behaviour is exhibited by one parent with the aim of undermining a child’s relationship with the other. Such characteristics and behaviour have come to be known as implacable or intractable hostility—a term that should only be applied to a parent who will do almost anything to frustrate a relationship between the child and their other parent.

Implacable hostility can often result in parental alienation. Parental alienation describes a situation where a child has been deliberately manipulated, coerced or otherwise pressured to align themselves to one parent by the other. The impact on children

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll