header-logo header-logo

The investment gap gains ground

26 October 2017
Issue: 7767 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7767_news1

Independent lawyers and midsize firms need to place higher value on technology and efficiency measures in order to survive the challenges ahead, the latest LexisNexis Bellwether report suggests.

In its second free market research report for 2017, Bellwether Report: Race to Evolve, LexisNexis identifies an investment gap.

A previous Bellwether report found that, while clients identified efficient service as their second most important priority, lawyers mistakenly assumed it would be ranked much lower. This latest Bellwether report explores the issue more deeply. It finds that small and midsize law firms say they value the use of legal processes, tools and technologies to drive efficiency. However, they do not invest highly in these areas. In fact, 81% of these firms spend less than 10% of their turnover on legal tools, and 58% of firms are spending less than 5%.

Jon Whittle, market development director at LexisNexis, said: ‘It’s clear from our research that those firms that are investing are far outpacing those who aren’t, and this isn’t going unnoticed by their clients.

‘While it seems many law firms understand where the gaps are, there is a push and pull phenomenon between traditional and modern working practices, and a disconnect between words and action. Ultimately, while many lawyers are still charging by the hour they are not understanding the value of their time—and this needs to change.’

The lawyers surveyed gave a mixed response when asked what they considered the most important drivers of efficiency in their firms. The frontrunner was ‘not dabbling outside your practice area’ (41%), whereas only 17% said ‘investing in new technology’.

As the report states, however, firms have said that 65% of the enquiries they receive on a regular basis fall outside their main practice areas. Only 9% of lawyers look into them or handle them internally, compared to 95% who refer such enquiries on to other firms.

The full report can be found at http://bit.ly/2gASYQZ.

Issue: 7767 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll