header-logo header-logo

IPPs—a disaster foretold?

14 January 2022 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
68394
Jon Robins considers the origins & consequences of the sentencing fiasco that was imprisonment for public protection

Thousands of prisoners are currently locked up past tariff—often for fairly minor offences—without hope of release, despite IPPs being scrapped more than a decade ago. Last November the scheme’s architect, Lord David Blunkett, performed the latest in a series of heart-felt mea culpas expressing sincere and public regret for what must have seemed like a good idea at the time.

The former New Labour home secretary pointed out, shockingly, that the mess of his creation is getting worse, not better. To be fair to Blunkett, his successors deserve their own share of blame for not fixing a crisis described as a ‘stain’ on our justice system by Ken Clarke (as a coalition government Lord Chancellor) when he scrapped the IPP back in 2012.

Where are we now?

‘Out of the 3,000 people who are still in prison on IPP, 1,300 of them are there because of recalls,’ Lord Blunkett told fellow peers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll