header-logo header-logo

14 January 2022 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

IPPs—a disaster foretold?

68394
Jon Robins considers the origins & consequences of the sentencing fiasco that was imprisonment for public protection

Thousands of prisoners are currently locked up past tariff—often for fairly minor offences—without hope of release, despite IPPs being scrapped more than a decade ago. Last November the scheme’s architect, Lord David Blunkett, performed the latest in a series of heart-felt mea culpas expressing sincere and public regret for what must have seemed like a good idea at the time.

The former New Labour home secretary pointed out, shockingly, that the mess of his creation is getting worse, not better. To be fair to Blunkett, his successors deserve their own share of blame for not fixing a crisis described as a ‘stain’ on our justice system by Ken Clarke (as a coalition government Lord Chancellor) when he scrapped the IPP back in 2012.

Where are we now?

‘Out of the 3,000 people who are still in prison on IPP, 1,300 of them are there because of recalls,’ Lord Blunkett told fellow peers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll