header-logo header-logo

IPPs—a disaster foretold?

14 January 2022 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
68394
Jon Robins considers the origins & consequences of the sentencing fiasco that was imprisonment for public protection

Thousands of prisoners are currently locked up past tariff—often for fairly minor offences—without hope of release, despite IPPs being scrapped more than a decade ago. Last November the scheme’s architect, Lord David Blunkett, performed the latest in a series of heart-felt mea culpas expressing sincere and public regret for what must have seemed like a good idea at the time.

The former New Labour home secretary pointed out, shockingly, that the mess of his creation is getting worse, not better. To be fair to Blunkett, his successors deserve their own share of blame for not fixing a crisis described as a ‘stain’ on our justice system by Ken Clarke (as a coalition government Lord Chancellor) when he scrapped the IPP back in 2012.

Where are we now?

‘Out of the 3,000 people who are still in prison on IPP, 1,300 of them are there because of recalls,’ Lord Blunkett told fellow peers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll