header-logo header-logo

IPPs—a disaster foretold?

14 January 2022 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
68394
Jon Robins considers the origins & consequences of the sentencing fiasco that was imprisonment for public protection

Thousands of prisoners are currently locked up past tariff—often for fairly minor offences—without hope of release, despite IPPs being scrapped more than a decade ago. Last November the scheme’s architect, Lord David Blunkett, performed the latest in a series of heart-felt mea culpas expressing sincere and public regret for what must have seemed like a good idea at the time.

The former New Labour home secretary pointed out, shockingly, that the mess of his creation is getting worse, not better. To be fair to Blunkett, his successors deserve their own share of blame for not fixing a crisis described as a ‘stain’ on our justice system by Ken Clarke (as a coalition government Lord Chancellor) when he scrapped the IPP back in 2012.

Where are we now?

‘Out of the 3,000 people who are still in prison on IPP, 1,300 of them are there because of recalls,’ Lord Blunkett told fellow peers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll