header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 January 2019 / Alison Padfield , Diarmuid Laffan
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Is the grass always greener?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Alison Padfield QC & Diarmuid Laffan analyse the obligations of SIPP providers
  • R (Berkeley Burke SIPP Administration Ltd) v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd shows that SIPP providers cannot rely on disclaimers to avoid liability where unorthodox investments turn out to be a scam.


    • In a landmark decision on the regulatory obligations of self-invested personal pension (SIPP) providers, the High Court has approved a decision of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) requiring a SIPP provider to compensate its client for an unorthodox investment which turned out to be a scam. This was notwithstanding the fact that the SIPP provider, Berkeley Burke SIPP Administration Ltd (Berkeley Burke), acted for the client, a Mr Charlton, on an execution-only basis and, hence, that Berkeley Burke was under no obligation to assess and advise him on the ‘suitability’ of the investment in light of his personal circumstances.

    In R (Berkeley Burke SIPP Administration Ltd) v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd [2018] EWHC 2878, [2018] All ER (D) 07 (Nov) the High Court rejected

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Read All
    Sponsored by
    EIP—Stuart Malcolm

    EIP—Stuart Malcolm

    EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

    Ellisons—Francesca Brown

    Ellisons—Francesca Brown

    Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

    Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

    Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

    Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

    NEWS
    Read All
    NLJ this week: A cautionary tale of bankruptcy and digital promises
    A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
    NLJ this week: Trade mark reality check for expanding brands
    A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
    NLJ this week: Relocation battles demand more than good intentions
    Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
    NLJ this week: Domestic abuse reform faces its hardest test
    The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
    NLJ this week: Open justice push brings experts into the spotlight
    A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
    Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
    back-to-top-scroll