header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 January 2019 / Alison Padfield , Diarmuid Laffan
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Is the grass always greener?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Alison Padfield QC & Diarmuid Laffan analyse the obligations of SIPP providers
  • R (Berkeley Burke SIPP Administration Ltd) v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd shows that SIPP providers cannot rely on disclaimers to avoid liability where unorthodox investments turn out to be a scam.


    • In a landmark decision on the regulatory obligations of self-invested personal pension (SIPP) providers, the High Court has approved a decision of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) requiring a SIPP provider to compensate its client for an unorthodox investment which turned out to be a scam. This was notwithstanding the fact that the SIPP provider, Berkeley Burke SIPP Administration Ltd (Berkeley Burke), acted for the client, a Mr Charlton, on an execution-only basis and, hence, that Berkeley Burke was under no obligation to assess and advise him on the ‘suitability’ of the investment in light of his personal circumstances.

    In R (Berkeley Burke SIPP Administration Ltd) v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd [2018] EWHC 2878, [2018] All ER (D) 07 (Nov) the High Court rejected

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Read All
    Sponsored by
    Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

    Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

    Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

    Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

    Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

    Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

    Muckle LLP—Roland Fairlamb

    Muckle LLP—Roland Fairlamb

    Specialist associate solicitor rejoins Muckle’s leading employment team

    NEWS
    Read All
    NLJ this week: Property cases reshape established principles
    A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
    NLJ this week: Stress ruling raises the bar for employers
    Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
    NLJ this week: Can Manchesterism revive access to justice?
    Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
    NLJ this week: Constitutional conventions tested as power changes hands
    The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
    NLJ this week: Lawyers must become product designers
    The legal profession is undergoing a fundamental shift from selling services to creating technology-enabled products, according to Professor Luke Mason, Head of School of Law at Regent's University London
    Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
    back-to-top-scroll