header-logo header-logo

14 March 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Jackson, fixed costs & the long view

nlj_7739_kendall

If costs management is judged to trump detailed assessment, then the rush to fixed costs could be stopped, says Francis Kendall

Lord Justice Jackson is busy revisiting old haunts from 2010 to gather the views of practitioners and others from across England and Wales about the extension of fixed recoverable costs (FRCs) that he has been charged with examining.

He openly came to the task with a view in favour of the wider application of FRCs in “lower-value” cases, but in his keynote address to a costs conference in early March, observed that the written and oral submissions received to date delivered a “strong message” that “despite all the criticisms in the past, costs management is now working much better”.

Sir Rupert reported: “It applies the new proportionality rule to the circumstances of each individual case. Many people are arguing that this does away with the need for fixed costs in the multi-track. The counter-argument

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll