header-logo header-logo

06 April 2018
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Jackson’s e-bills become compulsory

Solicitors should expect ‘significant teething problems’ with e-billing, which became compulsory in the county court and Senior Court Costs Office this week, the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) has warned.

However, it also urged solicitors not to ignore or be scared off by the change.

The new rules apply to multi-track claims unless fixed costs or scale costs apply, the receiving party is unrepresented or the court has ordered otherwise. Any work done from 6 April 2018 on must be an electronic bill.

However, there is a get-out clause—either on application by the parties or of its own motion, the court can disapply the requirement for an electronic bill.

ACL chairman Iain Stark said: ‘We are concerned that some judges have yet to receive training and/or the technology to view the bill from the bench, so this could initially be a popular course.

‘The reality is that some firms of solicitors are ready for “E-Day”, and have adopted the J-Codes model of recording work by phase, task and activity. Others still work from paper files. It will be a bumpy ride for them at first.’

ACL council member Claire Green, who has been leading the ACL’s work on the electronic bill, said the new bill would be a work in progress for some time, for judiciary, practitioners and the rule committee alike, and the practice direction was likely to need updating quickly.

‘The new bill will change the whole ethos and environment we’re working in, and we are concerned that too many people seem unaware of what’s coming,’ she said.

Work in progress includes the ACL’s version of the bill, with its technical team currently updating version 16. Green described Precedent S, the form for e-billing, as ‘very complicated’. She said she is working towards ‘getting everyone to use the ACL bill’, although any format that complies with certain requirements is acceptable.

The new bill is one of the last of Lord Justice Jackson’s recommendations to be implemented, and the judge himself said recently that it was bound to save time and costs. In his final speech before retiring last month, he said: ‘I predict that in three years from now people will be amazed that we had put up with the old paper-based bill for so long.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll