header-logo header-logo

06 April 2018
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Jackson’s e-bills become compulsory

Solicitors should expect ‘significant teething problems’ with e-billing, which became compulsory in the county court and Senior Court Costs Office this week, the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) has warned.

However, it also urged solicitors not to ignore or be scared off by the change.

The new rules apply to multi-track claims unless fixed costs or scale costs apply, the receiving party is unrepresented or the court has ordered otherwise. Any work done from 6 April 2018 on must be an electronic bill.

However, there is a get-out clause—either on application by the parties or of its own motion, the court can disapply the requirement for an electronic bill.

ACL chairman Iain Stark said: ‘We are concerned that some judges have yet to receive training and/or the technology to view the bill from the bench, so this could initially be a popular course.

‘The reality is that some firms of solicitors are ready for “E-Day”, and have adopted the J-Codes model of recording work by phase, task and activity. Others still work from paper files. It will be a bumpy ride for them at first.’

ACL council member Claire Green, who has been leading the ACL’s work on the electronic bill, said the new bill would be a work in progress for some time, for judiciary, practitioners and the rule committee alike, and the practice direction was likely to need updating quickly.

‘The new bill will change the whole ethos and environment we’re working in, and we are concerned that too many people seem unaware of what’s coming,’ she said.

Work in progress includes the ACL’s version of the bill, with its technical team currently updating version 16. Green described Precedent S, the form for e-billing, as ‘very complicated’. She said she is working towards ‘getting everyone to use the ACL bill’, although any format that complies with certain requirements is acceptable.

The new bill is one of the last of Lord Justice Jackson’s recommendations to be implemented, and the judge himself said recently that it was bound to save time and costs. In his final speech before retiring last month, he said: ‘I predict that in three years from now people will be amazed that we had put up with the old paper-based bill for so long.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll