header-logo header-logo

16 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Jackson talks fixed costs

Lord Justice Jackson has vowed to keep an open mind about what types and levels of cases should fall within proposals to extend fixed recoverable costs.

Sir Rupert, who is hosting a series of fact-finding seminars across the country, has said that his remit is to extend fixed costs to those cases in the fast track that are not currently subject to fixed costs and to cases on the multi-track which can properly be the subject of fixed costs.

Speaking in Manchester last week, Sir Rupert emphasised that he would be looking at costs and procedures, and floated the notion of an “intermediate” track between the fast and multi-track to which fixed costs would apply (potentially with appropriate ring-fencing) and “full” multi track claims, which would proceed by way of budgeting.

Future seminars are scheduled for Cardiff, Birmingham and London.

Issue: 7734 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll