header-logo header-logo

30 March 2022
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-detail

Joined up thinking to improve cybersecurity

A tool to help law firms assess the cybersecurity arrangements of the chambers whose barristers they instruct has been launched by the Bar Council and Law Society

It takes the form of a questionnaire with 26 questions, shorter and more tailored than other non-standardised forms. The Law Society and Bar Council recommend that chambers work with their IT suppliers and maintain an up-to-date copy of their responses to make available to instructing solicitors, and that they should aim to revise these every six months.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Because the Law Society has developed this questionnaire in partnership with the Bar Council, solicitors can be confident that the chambers they instruct should feel comfortable completing it.’

Mark Fenhalls QC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘This valuable new tool will help reassure clients that data is kept as secure as possible.’

Find out more at: here and here.
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll