header-logo header-logo

24 February 2021
Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Deceased claimant included on claim form

A High Court judge has expressed concern that solicitors in a county court case failed to mention that one of the claimants was deceased.

The dispute concerned title to a passageway between a petrol station and a Costcutter supermarket, in Amirtharaja v White [2021] EWHC 330 (Ch). There were three claimants to the action: William White, Frances White and their son, Colin White, who together purchased Hollis House, which was situated at one end of the passageway.

Finding in favour of the claimants, Mr Justice Michael Green said: ‘An extraordinary aspect of this case is that Mr William White died in September 2017 yet he was included as the first claimant on the claim form when it was issued on 14 January 2019.

‘At the trial no one referred to the fact that Mr William White remained a claimant and the judge clearly assumed in his judgment that he was still alive. Neither of the respondents, both of whom gave evidence, mentioned that he had died.’

Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll