header-logo header-logo

24 February 2021
Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Deceased claimant included on claim form

A High Court judge has expressed concern that solicitors in a county court case failed to mention that one of the claimants was deceased.

The dispute concerned title to a passageway between a petrol station and a Costcutter supermarket, in Amirtharaja v White [2021] EWHC 330 (Ch). There were three claimants to the action: William White, Frances White and their son, Colin White, who together purchased Hollis House, which was situated at one end of the passageway.

Finding in favour of the claimants, Mr Justice Michael Green said: ‘An extraordinary aspect of this case is that Mr William White died in September 2017 yet he was included as the first claimant on the claim form when it was issued on 14 January 2019.

‘At the trial no one referred to the fact that Mr William White remained a claimant and the judge clearly assumed in his judgment that he was still alive. Neither of the respondents, both of whom gave evidence, mentioned that he had died.’

Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll