header-logo header-logo

Judges’ salaries could rise

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Senior Salaries Review Body confirms major salary review

The government is to consult judges as part of a major review into judicial salaries and will take ‘recruitment’ into consideration, the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) has confirmed.

The SSRB wrote to the Lord Chief Justice and other heads of judiciary this week to say it will consult judges on how their previous earnings compare with their current salaries, as part of a major salaries review announced in December 2016.

Public sector pay awards will average one per cent in each year up to 2019-20. However, the SSRB said it would ‘look fundamentally at the pay structure, taking into account judicial recruitment in the light of the external market, retention and motivation. The changing nature of judicial roles will also be relevant’.

As part of the review, judges appointed to a salaried or fee-paid post since April 2012 will be surveyed in the autumn on their previous roles and salaries ‘to provide the SSRB with information on differentials in salary which individuals might experience on joining the judiciary’. The SSRB will submit its findings to the Lord Chancellor in June 2018.

In February, an official survey, the Judicial Attitude Survey, found low morale among salaried judges, with 75% saying they had suffered a loss in earnings in the past five years. A third of judges said they were considering leaving the judiciary in the next five years, but 83% said a higher salary would change their mind.

In March, Lord Neuberger raised concerns about recruitment before the House of Lords’ constitution committee, calling for the retirement age to be raised from 70 to 75 to stem the flow. The Judicial Appointments Commission told the same committee that vacancies for Crown Court and High Court judges are being left unfulfilled due to a shortage of suitably qualified applicants.

Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll