header-logo header-logo

Judges’ salaries could rise

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Senior Salaries Review Body confirms major salary review

The government is to consult judges as part of a major review into judicial salaries and will take ‘recruitment’ into consideration, the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) has confirmed.

The SSRB wrote to the Lord Chief Justice and other heads of judiciary this week to say it will consult judges on how their previous earnings compare with their current salaries, as part of a major salaries review announced in December 2016.

Public sector pay awards will average one per cent in each year up to 2019-20. However, the SSRB said it would ‘look fundamentally at the pay structure, taking into account judicial recruitment in the light of the external market, retention and motivation. The changing nature of judicial roles will also be relevant’.

As part of the review, judges appointed to a salaried or fee-paid post since April 2012 will be surveyed in the autumn on their previous roles and salaries ‘to provide the SSRB with information on differentials in salary which individuals might experience on joining the judiciary’. The SSRB will submit its findings to the Lord Chancellor in June 2018.

In February, an official survey, the Judicial Attitude Survey, found low morale among salaried judges, with 75% saying they had suffered a loss in earnings in the past five years. A third of judges said they were considering leaving the judiciary in the next five years, but 83% said a higher salary would change their mind.

In March, Lord Neuberger raised concerns about recruitment before the House of Lords’ constitution committee, calling for the retirement age to be raised from 70 to 75 to stem the flow. The Judicial Appointments Commission told the same committee that vacancies for Crown Court and High Court judges are being left unfulfilled due to a shortage of suitably qualified applicants.

Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll