header-logo header-logo

Judges’ salaries could rise

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Senior Salaries Review Body confirms major salary review

The government is to consult judges as part of a major review into judicial salaries and will take ‘recruitment’ into consideration, the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) has confirmed.

The SSRB wrote to the Lord Chief Justice and other heads of judiciary this week to say it will consult judges on how their previous earnings compare with their current salaries, as part of a major salaries review announced in December 2016.

Public sector pay awards will average one per cent in each year up to 2019-20. However, the SSRB said it would ‘look fundamentally at the pay structure, taking into account judicial recruitment in the light of the external market, retention and motivation. The changing nature of judicial roles will also be relevant’.

As part of the review, judges appointed to a salaried or fee-paid post since April 2012 will be surveyed in the autumn on their previous roles and salaries ‘to provide the SSRB with information on differentials in salary which individuals might experience on joining the judiciary’. The SSRB will submit its findings to the Lord Chancellor in June 2018.

In February, an official survey, the Judicial Attitude Survey, found low morale among salaried judges, with 75% saying they had suffered a loss in earnings in the past five years. A third of judges said they were considering leaving the judiciary in the next five years, but 83% said a higher salary would change their mind.

In March, Lord Neuberger raised concerns about recruitment before the House of Lords’ constitution committee, calling for the retirement age to be raised from 70 to 75 to stem the flow. The Judicial Appointments Commission told the same committee that vacancies for Crown Court and High Court judges are being left unfulfilled due to a shortage of suitably qualified applicants.

Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll