header-logo header-logo

Judges’ salaries could rise

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Senior Salaries Review Body confirms major salary review

The government is to consult judges as part of a major review into judicial salaries and will take ‘recruitment’ into consideration, the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) has confirmed.

The SSRB wrote to the Lord Chief Justice and other heads of judiciary this week to say it will consult judges on how their previous earnings compare with their current salaries, as part of a major salaries review announced in December 2016.

Public sector pay awards will average one per cent in each year up to 2019-20. However, the SSRB said it would ‘look fundamentally at the pay structure, taking into account judicial recruitment in the light of the external market, retention and motivation. The changing nature of judicial roles will also be relevant’.

As part of the review, judges appointed to a salaried or fee-paid post since April 2012 will be surveyed in the autumn on their previous roles and salaries ‘to provide the SSRB with information on differentials in salary which individuals might experience on joining the judiciary’. The SSRB will submit its findings to the Lord Chancellor in June 2018.

In February, an official survey, the Judicial Attitude Survey, found low morale among salaried judges, with 75% saying they had suffered a loss in earnings in the past five years. A third of judges said they were considering leaving the judiciary in the next five years, but 83% said a higher salary would change their mind.

In March, Lord Neuberger raised concerns about recruitment before the House of Lords’ constitution committee, calling for the retirement age to be raised from 70 to 75 to stem the flow. The Judicial Appointments Commission told the same committee that vacancies for Crown Court and High Court judges are being left unfulfilled due to a shortage of suitably qualified applicants.

Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—Ed Williams

DWF—Ed Williams

Public sector disputes capability bolstered by partner hire in Leeds

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Firm strengthens corporate, real estate and insolvency teams with partner trio

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Consultant and solicitor join commercial real estate team

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll