header-logo header-logo

Judges’ salary review delay

21 November 2022
Issue: 8004 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions , Employment
printer mail-detail
The five-year review of the judicial salary structure has been postponed, the Lord Chancellor Dominic Raab has confirmed.

Writing to Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) interim chair Pippa Lambert last week, Raab said: ‘We are due to have a major review of the judicial salary structure, which usually takes place every five years.

‘I understand your concerns about starting a major review before a new judicial lead and permanent chair of the SSRB are appointed and so have taken the decision not to commission such a review this year.’

He said recruitment has been ‘stronger’ since the last major review in 2018 due to a new judicial pension scheme, but acknowledged there are ‘shortfalls in the Circuit Bench and the District Bench, and the level of fee paid judges applying for salaried office continues to be an issue. These areas would be a likely focus of a future major review’.

However, Raab asked for recommendations on the 2023-24 annual pay award for judges to be submitted by May 2023. He said this should ‘take account of evidence which my department will provide, including on the affordability of any award as well as evidence on recruitment, retention and diversity of judges’.

In April 2022, the Judicial Pension Scheme, a defined benefit scheme, was introduced. This replaced a variety of schemes introduced in 2015 which many judges found to be less beneficial than their previous arrangements. In the 2018 major review, the SSRB highlighted recruitment and retention problems at all levels of the judiciary due to the 2015 pension reforms.

Judicial salaries currently range from £91,217 for judges at the social entitlement chamber (asylum support tribunal, criminal injuries compensation tribunal and social security and child support tribunal) to £267,509 for the Lord Chief Justice.

District judges, employment tribunal judges and First-tier Tribunal judges receive £114,793 per year, Senior masters and registrars earn £148,820, and High Court judges receive £192,679. 

Issue: 8004 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

Commercial disputes team lead promoted to partner

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Jersey finance and corporate practice welcomes new partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Firm launches solicitor apprenticeship programme with inaugural cohort

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll