header-logo header-logo

Judges struck by whiplash fears

28 February 2020
Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
Judges have told of their fears road traffic accident (RTA) claims will cause a ‘logjam’ and district judges will be ‘overwhelmed’ when personal injury reforms are introduced later in the year, writes NLJ columnist Dominic Regan

In a written statement to the House of Commons yesterday the Lord Chancellor announced that implementation of the reforms is to be delayed from 1 April to 1 August 2020.

Professor Regan writes that his last NLJ column, on problems with the proposed changes, ‘provoked an outpouring, the likes of which I have not experienced in 30 years’.

The subject of concern was the concept of ‘push down’, by which cases are cascaded downwards. Judges also expressed concern about the potential abandonment of alternative dispute resolution, the lack of properly qualified legal advisers, and the misery caused by unethical behaviuor on the part of claims management companies. One judge told Professor Regan they were ‘already having nightmares about paid McKenzie Friends pitching up’.

The proposed changes include increasing the small claims personal injury limit from £1,000 to £5,000 and introducing a tariff system for whiplash injuries, which is likely to decrease awards, devalue quantum and diminish legal costs.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll