header-logo header-logo

Judicial review re legal aid rates underway

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
The High Court was due to hear a judicial review this week brought by the Law Society against the Lord Chancellor’s decision not to increase criminal defence solicitors’ legal aid rates by 15%

The 15% figure is the minimum immediate rise recommended by Lord Bellamy’s independent review of criminal legal aid in 2021.

The legal challenge rests on four grounds: it was irrational not to implement the key recommendation; the decision lacked evidence-based reasons; the decision was in breach of the constitutional right of access to justice; and the Lord Chancellor made insufficient enquiries as to the state of the criminal legal aid sector.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said defence solicitors are deserting the profession because the work is not financially viable, with 1,400 duty solicitors leaving since 2017.

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll