header-logo header-logo

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Judicial review re legal aid rates underway

The High Court was due to hear a judicial review this week brought by the Law Society against the Lord Chancellor’s decision not to increase criminal defence solicitors’ legal aid rates by 15%

The 15% figure is the minimum immediate rise recommended by Lord Bellamy’s independent review of criminal legal aid in 2021.

The legal challenge rests on four grounds: it was irrational not to implement the key recommendation; the decision lacked evidence-based reasons; the decision was in breach of the constitutional right of access to justice; and the Lord Chancellor made insufficient enquiries as to the state of the criminal legal aid sector.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said defence solicitors are deserting the profession because the work is not financially viable, with 1,400 duty solicitors leaving since 2017.

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll