header-logo header-logo

28 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Equality , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Judiciary sets out diversity goals

The judiciary has set itself a trio of objectives and a trio of focus areas for the next five years, in its Judicial Diversity and Inclusion Strategy 2026-2030

Its objectives are that every judge fosters an inclusive working environment; expansion of the applicant pool through more engagement with under-represented groups; and career development for all salaried and fee-paid judges.

It will focus on increasing the number of Black judges, providing reasonable adjustments where required by disabled judges, and expanding diversity in the pool of applicants to the High Court and above.

More specific goals include a target of at least 1,000 judges involved in mentoring colleagues or other legal professionals to create a more inclusive workplace, and increasing the number of solicitors in the judiciary.

Welcoming the strategy, Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘The number of Black legal professionals on the bench has remained stubbornly stagnant for over a decade—remaining at 1%—showing that efforts to make improvements are not having the desired impact.’ 

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Equality , Career focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll