header-logo header-logo

Jurisdictional service gateways

29 September 2023 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 8042 / Categories: Features , Jurisdiction , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Janna Purdie provides a handy guide to cross-border service & jurisdiction clauses
  • Recent cases provide insight into one of the service gateways which enables claimants to serve a claim form overseas without the court’s permission. 

A vital step when commencing proceedings in the English courts is the valid service of the claim form on the defendant—failure provides the defendant with the opportunity to challenge the court’s jurisdiction to determine the claim. When serving overseas, an essential requirement is that the court has jurisdiction over the defendant(s) to determine the dispute before it. The rules setting out whether this is the case are known as the so-called ‘jurisdictional service gateways’ and are set out in:

  • CPR 6.32 and CPR 6.33—these rules enable the claimant to determine whether the court has jurisdiction, or 
  • CPR PD 6B, para 3.1—these rules are applied by the court when determining whether the gateway(s) relied on by the claimant are applicable ie an application for permission to serve out of the jurisdiction is required.

In both cases, the court’s jurisdiction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll