header-logo header-logo

29 September 2023 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 8042 / Categories: Features , Jurisdiction , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Jurisdictional service gateways

Janna Purdie provides a handy guide to cross-border service & jurisdiction clauses
  • Recent cases provide insight into one of the service gateways which enables claimants to serve a claim form overseas without the court’s permission. 

A vital step when commencing proceedings in the English courts is the valid service of the claim form on the defendant—failure provides the defendant with the opportunity to challenge the court’s jurisdiction to determine the claim. When serving overseas, an essential requirement is that the court has jurisdiction over the defendant(s) to determine the dispute before it. The rules setting out whether this is the case are known as the so-called ‘jurisdictional service gateways’ and are set out in:

  • CPR 6.32 and CPR 6.33—these rules enable the claimant to determine whether the court has jurisdiction, or 
  • CPR PD 6B, para 3.1—these rules are applied by the court when determining whether the gateway(s) relied on by the claimant are applicable ie an application for permission to serve out of the jurisdiction is required.

In both cases, the court’s jurisdiction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll