header-logo header-logo

26 March 2010 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Just the beginning

Much of what has been written on the Jackson report so far suggests that the time for debate is over. This is not correct. The debate is just beginning.

Much of what has been written on the Jackson report so far suggests that the time for debate is over. This is not correct. The debate is just beginning. We can see that costs in personal injury cases are the main target of the report. The Jackson package has the potential to cause grave disadvantage to injured claimants and their ability to bring forward their claims.

We therefore have an obligation to subject the proposals to rigorous scrutiny to see whether they represent an improvement on the current system or a setback to access to justice.

Principles

Civilised society must have an effective system of civil and criminal justice which ensures that all citizens, rich or poor can bring their claims to court. Before 1950, we had no legal aid. Only the wealthy and some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll