header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Just Fabulous delivers blow to carousel fraud

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has won a court victory against VAT ‘carousel’ fraud.

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has won a court victory against VAT ‘carousel’ fraud. Mr Justice Burton in R (Just Fabulous (UK) Ltd) v HM Revenue & Customs held that Just Fabulous could not reclaim £19.5m VAT relating to its purchase of mobile phones from four suppliers.

The case concerns a type of carousel fraud—the repeated importing and exporting of goods from EU countries, with the VAT being reclaimed each time— known as contra or offset trading where carousels across several borders are linked, making it more difficult for the authorities to track them down.

Just Fabulous and two other firms, Evolution Export Trading and Brayfal, claimed they could not have been expected to know a fraud was taking place in a trade chain different from theirs.

HMRC successfully argued that the European Court of Justice case, Axel Kittel v Belgian State: C-439/04, applied to offset trading, meaning it was entitled to deny repayment to firms

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll