header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Just Fabulous delivers blow to carousel fraud

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has won a court victory against VAT ‘carousel’ fraud.

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has won a court victory against VAT ‘carousel’ fraud. Mr Justice Burton in R (Just Fabulous (UK) Ltd) v HM Revenue & Customs held that Just Fabulous could not reclaim £19.5m VAT relating to its purchase of mobile phones from four suppliers.

The case concerns a type of carousel fraud—the repeated importing and exporting of goods from EU countries, with the VAT being reclaimed each time— known as contra or offset trading where carousels across several borders are linked, making it more difficult for the authorities to track them down.

Just Fabulous and two other firms, Evolution Export Trading and Brayfal, claimed they could not have been expected to know a fraud was taking place in a trade chain different from theirs.

HMRC successfully argued that the European Court of Justice case, Axel Kittel v Belgian State: C-439/04, applied to offset trading, meaning it was entitled to deny repayment to firms

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll