header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Just Fabulous delivers blow to carousel fraud

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has won a court victory against VAT ‘carousel’ fraud.

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has won a court victory against VAT ‘carousel’ fraud. Mr Justice Burton in R (Just Fabulous (UK) Ltd) v HM Revenue & Customs held that Just Fabulous could not reclaim £19.5m VAT relating to its purchase of mobile phones from four suppliers.

The case concerns a type of carousel fraud—the repeated importing and exporting of goods from EU countries, with the VAT being reclaimed each time— known as contra or offset trading where carousels across several borders are linked, making it more difficult for the authorities to track them down.

Just Fabulous and two other firms, Evolution Export Trading and Brayfal, claimed they could not have been expected to know a fraud was taking place in a trade chain different from theirs.

HMRC successfully argued that the European Court of Justice case, Axel Kittel v Belgian State: C-439/04, applied to offset trading, meaning it was entitled to deny repayment to firms

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll