header-logo header-logo

A justified retrospective

26 April 2012 / Clive Sheldon KC
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Clive Sheldon QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation

The exchequer secretary to the Treasury, David Gauke MP, hit the headlines recently when he announced that the government will legislate to close a loophole under which companies (such as Barclays Bank plc) avoid the payment of corporation tax when buying back their debt. The most controversial aspect of the legislation is that it will be retrospective, subjecting to corporation tax debt purchases that occurred on or after 1 December 2011.

The retrospective nature of the proposed legislation has come in for criticism. The Adam Smith Institute has said that ex post facto law is “unacceptable because it makes coercive rules random at the behest of the rule maker”. Such legislation breaches the principle of certainty.

Without debating the rights and wrongs of this particular taxing measure, there is no doubt that retrospective tax legislation can be lawful. Domestic courts will construe legislation as having retrospective effect where this is clear on its face, and will accept the proposition that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll