header-logo header-logo

18 October 2013 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Keeping it in the family

istock_000017813321medium

Michael Tringham follows families at war over intestacy claims

Two recent cases reveal the consequences of exposing family wounds in court. Both involve an adult child seeking to have their deceased parent declared intestate.

Brothers at law

When Daphne Jeffery died aged 76 in February 2010—10 days after her divorce was declared absolute—her last will left her £350,000 estate to the children of her son Andrew, and to her other son and joint executor Nicholas. Within four months Andrew, excluded from the will following a family dispute, was claiming for reasonable provision under the Inheritance Act 1975, asserting testamentary incapacity and undue influence by Nicholas.

During a four-day hearing this summer (Jeffery & Anor v Jeffery [2013] EWHC 1942 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 124 (Jul)) Mr Justice Vos heard evidence from barristers, solicitors and doctors before concluding: “The deceased obviously had capacity to make her wills. She never suffered from any mentally incapacitating complaint, even if she did experience occasional anxiety and mild depression.

“If people suffering from such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll