header-logo header-logo

Keeping it in the family

18 October 2013 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
istock_000017813321medium

Michael Tringham follows families at war over intestacy claims

Two recent cases reveal the consequences of exposing family wounds in court. Both involve an adult child seeking to have their deceased parent declared intestate.

Brothers at law

When Daphne Jeffery died aged 76 in February 2010—10 days after her divorce was declared absolute—her last will left her £350,000 estate to the children of her son Andrew, and to her other son and joint executor Nicholas. Within four months Andrew, excluded from the will following a family dispute, was claiming for reasonable provision under the Inheritance Act 1975, asserting testamentary incapacity and undue influence by Nicholas.

During a four-day hearing this summer (Jeffery & Anor v Jeffery [2013] EWHC 1942 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 124 (Jul)) Mr Justice Vos heard evidence from barristers, solicitors and doctors before concluding: “The deceased obviously had capacity to make her wills. She never suffered from any mentally incapacitating complaint, even if she did experience occasional anxiety and mild depression.

“If people suffering from such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll