header-logo header-logo

Keeping it in the family

18 October 2013 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
istock_000017813321medium

Michael Tringham follows families at war over intestacy claims

Two recent cases reveal the consequences of exposing family wounds in court. Both involve an adult child seeking to have their deceased parent declared intestate.

Brothers at law

When Daphne Jeffery died aged 76 in February 2010—10 days after her divorce was declared absolute—her last will left her £350,000 estate to the children of her son Andrew, and to her other son and joint executor Nicholas. Within four months Andrew, excluded from the will following a family dispute, was claiming for reasonable provision under the Inheritance Act 1975, asserting testamentary incapacity and undue influence by Nicholas.

During a four-day hearing this summer (Jeffery & Anor v Jeffery [2013] EWHC 1942 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 124 (Jul)) Mr Justice Vos heard evidence from barristers, solicitors and doctors before concluding: “The deceased obviously had capacity to make her wills. She never suffered from any mentally incapacitating complaint, even if she did experience occasional anxiety and mild depression.

“If people suffering from such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll