header-logo header-logo

28 March 2025 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Keeping order

212902
Neil Parpworth dissects the proposed new public order offences contained within the Crime & Policing Bill
  • Part 9 of the Crime and Policing Bill proposes three new public order offences.
  • These are concealing a person’s identity in the context of a protest; being in possession of a ‘pyrotechnic article’ at a protest; and climbing on a specified war memorial.

The Labour government’s Crime and Policing Bill had its first reading in the House of Commons on 25 February 2025. It is a substantial measure which, in its present form, consists of 137 clauses and 17 schedules. A number of its provisions have been borrowed directly from the previous Conservative government’s Criminal Justice Bill, which got as far as the report stage in the 2023–24 parliamentary session before the general election intervened.

Thus, for example, both Bills made/make largely identical provision for a new warrantless power to enter and search for bladed articles, which may be seized if found, and for a further warrantless power of entry, search and seizure in relation to electronically

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll