header-logo header-logo

28 March 2025 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Keeping order

212902
Neil Parpworth dissects the proposed new public order offences contained within the Crime & Policing Bill
  • Part 9 of the Crime and Policing Bill proposes three new public order offences.
  • These are concealing a person’s identity in the context of a protest; being in possession of a ‘pyrotechnic article’ at a protest; and climbing on a specified war memorial.

The Labour government’s Crime and Policing Bill had its first reading in the House of Commons on 25 February 2025. It is a substantial measure which, in its present form, consists of 137 clauses and 17 schedules. A number of its provisions have been borrowed directly from the previous Conservative government’s Criminal Justice Bill, which got as far as the report stage in the 2023–24 parliamentary session before the general election intervened.

Thus, for example, both Bills made/make largely identical provision for a new warrantless power to enter and search for bladed articles, which may be seized if found, and for a further warrantless power of entry, search and seizure in relation to electronically

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll