header-logo header-logo

07 May 2009 / Mark Surguy , Tracey Stretton
Issue: 7368 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Keeping up with the pirates

Will the Pirate Bay case deter illegal file sharing? Tracey Stretton & Mark Surguy report

An ideological war is being waged between those who believe in a free information society and supporters of Internet regulation. Some argue for a free flow of media and information over the Internet, without state interference or corporate control. Others have argued against illegal file sharing for years as copyright holders suffer violations of their rights and significant financial loss—95% of music downloads are unauthorised, with no payment to artists and producers.

Global entertainment giants recently claimed what is being hailed as a major victory. In a case brought in Stockholm last month by Warner Bros, Fox Movies, Sony Music and EMI, four founders of the Pirate Bay, a filesharing website, were jailed for a year and ordered to damages of £2.4m. Their crime was helping internet users download protected music, movies and computer games. The entertainment industry has welcomed the “landmark decision”, however, even as they were convicted, millions of Internet users were busy downloading

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll