header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 May 2009 / Mark Surguy , Tracey Stretton
Issue: 7368 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Keeping up with the pirates

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Will the Pirate Bay case deter illegal file sharing? Tracey Stretton & Mark Surguy report

An ideological war is being waged between those who believe in a free information society and supporters of Internet regulation. Some argue for a free flow of media and information over the Internet, without state interference or corporate control. Others have argued against illegal file sharing for years as copyright holders suffer violations of their rights and significant financial loss—95% of music downloads are unauthorised, with no payment to artists and producers.

Global entertainment giants recently claimed what is being hailed as a major victory. In a case brought in Stockholm last month by Warner Bros, Fox Movies, Sony Music and EMI, four founders of the Pirate Bay, a filesharing website, were jailed for a year and ordered to damages of £2.4m. Their crime was helping internet users download protected music, movies and computer games. The entertainment industry has welcomed the “landmark decision”, however, even as they were convicted, millions of Internet users were busy downloading

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll