header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 November 2024 / David Bloom
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Contempt
printer mail-detail

Keeping schtum: embargo no-nos

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
195045
David Bloom on how to treat embargoed judgments & avoid contempt proceedings
  • In R v Counihan, the Court of Appeal Criminal Division re-emphasised the importance of embargoed draft judgments.
  • For practitioners, the judgment provides a sobering warning and steer as to the preventative measures now required.

Civil practitioners will be aware of the repeated recent judicial warnings relating to breaches of embargoed draft judgments. In Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland [2021] UKSC 58, [2022] 2 All ER 401, the Supreme Court considered a particular egregious breach and confirmed that embargoes are made for protecting the administration of justice (at [58]).

In R (Counsel General for Wales) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181, [2022] 4 All ER 599, after accepting ‘unreserved apologies’ for the accidental breach caused by a misunderstanding in a chambers’ marketing department that led to the release of a pre-prepared press release early, the Master of the Rolls warned: ‘In future, those who break embargoes can expect to find themselves

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll