header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007 / Judy Stone
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Keeping tabs

Should employers be allowed to spy on their staff? Judy Stone investigates

Most employers take part in some monitoring of their employees. For example, employers may check that work is completed in good time and may review work produced and assess its quality. Workers, however, often use their employer’s e-mail facilities, internet and telephone systems for personal purposes as well as for work. It is not always easy to draw a distinction between private information and matters related to work.
Employers may wish to monitor these communications. After all, the hardware and the software are owned by the employer and the correspondence may be carried out during the working day. In many cases, employees will expect this. They are likely to expect that their work will be checked and may be aware of the possibility of their communications being reviewed.

Yet, monitoring may, to different degrees, have an adverse impact on employees. It may intrude into their private lives, and undermine respect for the privacy of their correspondence. It may interfere with healthy working relationships. Many

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll