header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007 / Judy Stone
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Keeping tabs

Should employers be allowed to spy on their staff? Judy Stone investigates

Most employers take part in some monitoring of their employees. For example, employers may check that work is completed in good time and may review work produced and assess its quality. Workers, however, often use their employer’s e-mail facilities, internet and telephone systems for personal purposes as well as for work. It is not always easy to draw a distinction between private information and matters related to work.
Employers may wish to monitor these communications. After all, the hardware and the software are owned by the employer and the correspondence may be carried out during the working day. In many cases, employees will expect this. They are likely to expect that their work will be checked and may be aware of the possibility of their communications being reviewed.

Yet, monitoring may, to different degrees, have an adverse impact on employees. It may intrude into their private lives, and undermine respect for the privacy of their correspondence. It may interfere with healthy working relationships. Many

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll