header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007 / Judy Stone
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Keeping tabs

Should employers be allowed to spy on their staff? Judy Stone investigates

Most employers take part in some monitoring of their employees. For example, employers may check that work is completed in good time and may review work produced and assess its quality. Workers, however, often use their employer’s e-mail facilities, internet and telephone systems for personal purposes as well as for work. It is not always easy to draw a distinction between private information and matters related to work.
Employers may wish to monitor these communications. After all, the hardware and the software are owned by the employer and the correspondence may be carried out during the working day. In many cases, employees will expect this. They are likely to expect that their work will be checked and may be aware of the possibility of their communications being reviewed.

Yet, monitoring may, to different degrees, have an adverse impact on employees. It may intrude into their private lives, and undermine respect for the privacy of their correspondence. It may interfere with healthy working relationships. Many

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll