header-logo header-logo

Keoghs—Gary Petterson & Stuart Clemson

28 October 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Insurance fraud team appoints two partners

 

Keoghs has reinforced its market-leading fraud division with two high profile appointments.

Gary Petterson and Stuart Clemson both join as partners from Plexus and bring with them a wealth of expertise across all areas of insurance fraud.

They join a department which has spearheaded the fight against insurance fraud for over two decades, with a team of 14 Partners and more than 200 specialists boasting 1,600 years of experience, who resolved almost 6,000 matters in the last 12 months alone.

Gary was Head of Fraud at Plexus, where he worked for 12 years. He has a varied practice including motor and employers’ & public liability claims, with particular experience in grossly exaggerated complex injury claims. He also advises clients on indemnity and coverage issues where dishonesty is suspected.

On joining the team, Gary said: ‘I am delighted to have joined Keoghs. The gravitational pull of the biggest, and in my opinion the best, defendant legal counter-fraud team was too much to resist. I am excited about what the future holds!’ 

Stuart has over 19 years of counter-fraud experience working for a number of major defendant insurance firms. He deals with all aspects of motor claims and handles complex indemnity issues, along with recovery actions following successful claims for tort of deceit and conspiracy, whilst also having lead several private prosecutions.

Stuart commented: 'This is a big opportunity to work for one of, if not the, biggest counter-fraud teams in the country; a chance I had to grasp. I have also personally come full circle as it was Keoghs who inspired me to begin a career in law, back when I worked for a major insurance client. I’m thrilled to be here.'

Head of Fraud, Damian Ward, added: 'I’m absolutely delighted to welcome Gary and Stuart to the team. Both have an exceptional reputation throughout the industry, and their appointments underline Keoghs’ commitment to the market. As fraudulent claims continue to diversify, their decades of experience can only reinforce the industry-leading strategic support we deliver to our clients in the fight against insurance fraud.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Private wealth and tax offering bolstered by partner hire

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll