header-logo header-logo

Kick back and relax

22 February 2007 / Margaret Lang
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Outsourcing allows law firms the chance to rejuvenate their services, says Margaret Lang

While consolidation and competition continue to exert pressure on law firm management in the UK, the legal profession has followed commerce and industry’s example: importing outsourcing as a management tool. This apparently simple concept has long been regarded in the corporate world as a key mechanism to deliver effective business strategies and tactical objectives such as improved customer response, faster delivery times, reduced assets or headcount, as well as converting fixed overhead costs into variable contracted costs. In many organisations functions such as IT, finance and human resources (HR) have been outsourced to expert providers who service a number of similar businesses and can therefore deliver economies and efficiencies of scale which are passed back to the client.

Incentive to outsource

Although relatively unexplored within law firm management—with a few high-profile exceptions in the largest firms—the outsourcing debate has moved quickly in the last two to three years. Firms increasingly seek to improve client service levels, positively impact partner profits

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll