header-logo header-logo

10 May 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Kingsley Napley—four new partner hires

Law firm welcomes four partners
Kingsley Napley has recently announced four new partners at the firm.

Jessica Clay specialises in legal services regulation, advising law firms and partners on SRA compliance and authorisation matters, reporting obligations, changes to business structures, issues of professional misconduct and law firm culture. She previously worked for the Legal Services Board and then the Solicitors Regulation Authority before joining Kingsley Napley in 2019. She is also Deputy Editor of the leading textbook on legal services regulation, Cordery on Legal Services.

Lauren Evans specialises in private family law work, including cross-border matrimonial disputes, complex financial arrangements arising from divorce, children issues, pre- and postnuptial agreements. Lauren is also a mediator helping clients to resolve matters away from a court setting. She is an active member of Resolution and the International Association of Young Lawyers. She trained with the firm, joining in 2010.

Laura Sylvester is an expert in catastrophic brain injury claims, especially those relating to children with cerebral palsy. She also has a special interest in cases relating to delayed diagnosis of various conditions and fatal claims, where she often acts for families in the Coroner’s Court in Pre Inquest Review and Inquest hearings. Laura is a panel member of Action against Medical Accidents and a member of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers. She joined Kingsley Napley in 2011.

Kim Vowden advises on all areas of business immigration and has extensive experience of advising employers in the finance, media and technology sectors. He is an active member of the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association, the European Immigration Lawyers’ Network and the Law Society’s Immigration Law Committee. He joined Kingsley Napley in 2015.

Linda Woolley, Managing Partner of Kingsley Napley, commented: 'I am delighted to welcome Jessica, Lauren, Laura and Kim to the partnership. They have each made excellent contributions to their respective practice areas and the firm, and are well regarded by their clients and colleagues. Their promotions are thoroughly well-deserved'.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll