header-logo header-logo

Kingsley Napley—three promotions

10 May 2023
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Firm appoints three new partners as part of annual promotions round
Kingsley Napley LLP has announced three new partners as part of its annual promotions round. This brings the total number of partners at the firm to an all-time high of 82 (53% female, one of the largest Top100 ratios).

Those who have been made up to partner, with effect from the beginning of this month, are:

  • Richard Clayman—Richard (pictured) works in the Dispute Resolution practice, with a particular focus on civil fraud cases and disputes involving shareholders, directors and partnerships. He acts for both claimants and defendants, often in complex, multi jurisdiction and high value claims. He joined Kingsley Napley in 2019 from Peters & Peters. 
  • Matthew Hardcastle—Matt works in the General Crime team specialising in law enforcement investigations, youth crime, and sexual misconduct in the workplace investigations. He acts for young people accused of serious criminal offences and has advised several high profile individuals and employers on #MeToo related matters. He is an expert in police station representation as well criminal investigations conducted by the SFO and other agencies. He combines his practice with authorship – having co-authored various practitioners’ books on police station law and procedure.
  • Stacey Nevin—Stacey works in the Family & Divorce team. She advises UK and international clients on all aspects of family law, including complex financial issues on divorce and private children cases. She has particular expertise in international family issues and cross-border disputes, and financial cases involving trust arrangements. Stacey is also a family mediator working with couples to help them resolve issues arising from their separation without the need to attend court. She joined Kingsley Napley in 2016 from Howard Kennedy. 
Linda Woolley, Managing Partner of Kingsley Napley, comments: 'I am delighted to welcome Richard, Matt and Stacey to the partnership. They have each made excellent contributions to their respective practice areas and are well regarded by their clients and colleagues. Their promotions are thoroughly well-deserved, and I know they will continue to be impressive in their new roles.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll