header-logo header-logo

09 March 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lake Legal—Claire Glaister

Family law practice appoints managing partner
Lake Legal has recently appointed Claire Glaister (pictured, second from the right) as managing partner. 

The firm will see founder Lyn Ayrton (pictured, second from the left), who remains the senior partner, concentrate on strategic development and growing arbitration practice. 

Lyn and Claire have both been singled out for their expertise in family law. Lyn is one of only a handful of solicitors in the region qualified to arbitrate cases rather than clients having to resort to the court, which is an expensive and lengthy process.

Alongside the management changes, the firm has made two new appointments. Brooke Dempsey (pictured, far left), who originally joined the firm as a paralegal, is appointed as a newly qualified solicitor and Rhianna Cameron (pictured, far right), who graduated from law school in 2021, is a paralegal. Alongside the management changes, the firm has made two new appointments. Brooke Dempsey, who originally joined the firm as a paralegal, is appointed as a newly qualified solicitor and Rhianna Cameron, who graduated from law school in 2021, is a paralegal. 

Commenting on the developments, Claire Glaister said: 'Lake Legal has grown to become a highly respected family law firm, and it’s thanks to our ability to recruit and retain the best talent. As we look forward to our next growth phase, it’s great to see young lawyers like Brooke and Rhianna developing their careers with us.

'I first worked with Lyn Ayrton over 20 years ago as a work experience student, and she has supported my career ever since that time. When I joined Lake Legal over 12 years ago, I knew that I was joining a unique law firm that is a great place to work.'

Lyn Ayrton added: 'It’s a proud moment for me to see Claire become managing partner, as we continue to grow and attract new talent to the firm. I set out to build a family law firm that put its people and clients first, and this approach continues to drive the firm forward.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll