header-logo header-logo

Landlord & tenant

13 January 2017
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Kateb v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd and another [2016] EWCA Civ 1176, [2016] All ER (D) 42 (Dec)

 

The Court of Appeal held that the proper construction of para 7 of Sch 11 to the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 was to give “other” landlords, as defined under the Act, a right to be represented and heard in tribunal proceedings, but nothing more. Consequently, the court dismissed the claimant intermediate landlord’s appeal, and upheld the finding of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) that an agreement between the competent landlord and the tenant was binding upon the claimant, notwithstanding the fact that she had exercised her right to be separately represented.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll