header-logo header-logo

26 May 2011
Issue: 7467 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Landlords plastered

Landlords are legally responsible for the upkeep of the plaster of a rental property as well as the walls, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

In Grand v Gill [2011] EWCA Civ 554, a tenant brought a disrepair claim against the landlord, complaining of damp and mould on the walls. However, the landlord disputed liability.

The case centred on whether, in s 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, “the structure” of a residential premises, which the landlord is obliged to repair, included plasterwork.

The court held that plasterwork was included, overturning the case of Irvine v Moran [1991] 1 EGLR 261. This means private and public landlords, including local authorities and housing associations, have a legal duty to maintain the plasterwork of their properties.

John de Waal, of Hardwicke, who acted pro bono for Tanya Grand, the tenant, said: “This decision is very significant for housing lawyers, and affects every assured shorthold tenancy.

“This is a vexed issue for housing lawyers and has been before the courts three or four times. There is a lot of litigation about disrepair, particularly in social housing, and it is quite expensive for landlords. However, this fairly and squarely and on uncompromising terms establishes that the landlord is responsible for plasterwork.”
 

Issue: 7467 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll