header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 May 2018 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7792 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Criminal
printer mail-detail

#The Law Is Broken

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7792_robins

Jon Robins laments the state of a criminal justice system beset by legal aid cuts, unconscious bias & miscarriages of justice

As barristers return to man the metaphorical barricades to protest the latest round of legal aid cuts and the solicitors’ professional body gloomily predict ‘extinction’ for its ageing members (according to Law Society research, the average age of duty solicitors is 47 years), few lawyers would take issue with the oft-repeated assertion in the legal Twittersphere: #TheLawIsBroken.

Even senior judges are speaking out. Earlier this month, Lady Justice Hallett told The Guardian that the English justice system was hanging on to its reputation as the best in the world by its ‘fingernails’ and her boss, the Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett of Maldon, complained that under-investment in the court estate ‘amounted to neglect’.

Measure of contempt

Austerity has hit the criminal justice system hard. Towards the end of last year, it was revealed that by the end of the decade the Ministry of Justice (MoJ)’s budget will have been slashed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll