Zeynalov v BP Exploration (Caspian Sea) Ltd (EAT, 3 July 2008)
Rule 19(1) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2004 underlines the importance of an opportunity for the party who is facing a strike-out order to put forward orally his reasons why such a draconian order should not be made against him. A refusal to allow an oral hearing represents a major departure from the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly.
Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team
Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role
Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert
Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.
