header-logo header-logo

10 June 2020
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 12 June 2020

Adoption

HX v A local authority and others [2020] EWHC 1287 (Fam), [2020] All ER (D) 16 (Jun)

Notwithstanding the criticisms the court had levelled at the first respondent local authority and the previous children’s guardian, regarding the steps taken during the care and placement proceedings to identify and locate a child’s birth father, the birth father had not demonstrated the highly exceptional circumstances grounded in a fundamental breach of natural justice required to justify the High Court revoking an adoption order pursuant to its inherent jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Family Division set aside the birth father’s application to revoke the adoption order, concerning a child whom the Red Cross had reunited with the birth mother, after she had fled Uganda and had claimed asylum in the UK, and where she had allegedly indicated to the Red Cross that the child had been the product of rape, and had initially provided no information regarding the birth father.


Company

Re Lehman Brothers Europe Ltd (in administration) [2020] EWHC 1369 (Ch), [2020]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll