header-logo header-logo

Criminal litigation

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Roberts [2008] EWCA Crim 1304, [2008] All ER (D) 226 (Jun)

Police officers searched the defendant’s home. A bag containing drugs was found in the kitchen. Two firearms were found in the bedroom. The defendant was charged with unlawful possession of drugs and with firearms offences. He argued that the drugs counts and firearms counts should not appear on the same indictment.

HELD The phrase “founded on the same facts” in r 14.2 of the Criminal Procedure Rules does not mean that, for charges to be properly joined in the same indictment, the facts in relation to the respective charges have to be identical in substance or virtually contemporaneous. The test was whether the facts have a common factual origin. In the present case, joinder was proper.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll