header-logo header-logo

17 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Civil litigation

Egan v Motor Services (Bath) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1002, [2007] All ER (D) 256 (Oct)

The purpose of the judge providing a draft of the judgment before handing it down is to “enable the parties to spot typographical, spelling and minor factual errors which have escaped the judge’s eye. It is also to give the parties the opportunity to attempt to reach agreement on costs and to consider whether they wish to appeal”.

 

However, circulation of the draft “is not intended to provide counsel with an opportunity to re-argue the issues in the case”. It follows that “only in the most exceptional circumstances is it appropriate to ask the judge to reconsider a point of substance”.

 

Examples include “where counsel feels that the judge had not given adequate reasons for some aspect of his/her decision” (in which case the judge may be asked to explain the reasons more fully) or “if the judge has decided the case on a point which was not properly argued or has relied on an authority which was not considered” (in which case the appropriate course will be to ask him to reconvene for further argument or to receive written submissions from both sides).

 

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll