header-logo header-logo

17 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Civil litigation

Egan v Motor Services (Bath) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1002, [2007] All ER (D) 256 (Oct)

The purpose of the judge providing a draft of the judgment before handing it down is to “enable the parties to spot typographical, spelling and minor factual errors which have escaped the judge’s eye. It is also to give the parties the opportunity to attempt to reach agreement on costs and to consider whether they wish to appeal”.

 

However, circulation of the draft “is not intended to provide counsel with an opportunity to re-argue the issues in the case”. It follows that “only in the most exceptional circumstances is it appropriate to ask the judge to reconsider a point of substance”.

 

Examples include “where counsel feels that the judge had not given adequate reasons for some aspect of his/her decision” (in which case the judge may be asked to explain the reasons more fully) or “if the judge has decided the case on a point which was not properly argued or has relied on an authority which was not considered” (in which case the appropriate course will be to ask him to reconvene for further argument or to receive written submissions from both sides).

 

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll