header-logo header-logo

Civil litigation

17 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Egan v Motor Services (Bath) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1002, [2007] All ER (D) 256 (Oct)

The purpose of the judge providing a draft of the judgment before handing it down is to “enable the parties to spot typographical, spelling and minor factual errors which have escaped the judge’s eye. It is also to give the parties the opportunity to attempt to reach agreement on costs and to consider whether they wish to appeal”.

 

However, circulation of the draft “is not intended to provide counsel with an opportunity to re-argue the issues in the case”. It follows that “only in the most exceptional circumstances is it appropriate to ask the judge to reconsider a point of substance”.

 

Examples include “where counsel feels that the judge had not given adequate reasons for some aspect of his/her decision” (in which case the judge may be asked to explain the reasons more fully) or “if the judge has decided the case on a point which was not properly argued or has relied on an authority which was not considered” (in which case the appropriate course will be to ask him to reconvene for further argument or to receive written submissions from both sides).

 

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll