header-logo header-logo

17 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tort

M v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] EWCA Civ 1361, [2007] All ER (D) 368 (Dec)

 

When taking a decision of whether or not to prosecute, no duty of care is owed to victims, even where the decision took into account the interests of the victims. It would not be reasonable to impose such a duty, since prosecutors must have regard to the wider public interest, as well as the interests of victims (which may not coincide with the public interest or the interests of other victims) and all other relevant circumstances.

Moreover, so far as the police are concerned, the effect of imposing such a duty might be that investigations would be carried out defensively and resources would be diverted from the most important function of the police, that of the suppression of crime.

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll